Superior Court of California, County of Santa Barbara

Welcome to CADRe

Legal disputes are often expensive and time-consuming to resolve. In 1996, the Santa Barbara Superior Court’s Appropriate Dispute Resolution Programs Committee began work on a “multi-door courthouse” model designed to offer litigants with pending civil cases several alternatives for resolution of their cases other than traditional litigation of the dispute. The committee’s work culminated in the inauguration of the CADRe Program in July of 1999.

The Committee developed the following dispute resolution alternatives along with the existing litigation format:


A trained, experienced neutral meets with all parties to help them negotiate a mutually-acceptable resolution to their case. The mediator does not impose a decision on the parties, but rather assists the parties in exploring options for resolution, typically focusing on the parties’ interests. The disputants retain total control of the outcome.

Binding Arbitration

– An experienced, neutral arbitrator hears the evidence in a case, makes a determination, and issues an award. Binding arbitration is final. It brings closure with very few rights of appeal.

Early Neutral Evaluation

A neutral with subject matter expertise evaluates the claims and supporting evidence and offers an assessment of the merits of the case. The evaluator can clarify the central issues in dispute, assist with discovery and motion planning, or can facilitate settlement discussions if requested by the parties. These assessments are not binding, however, equipped with this information cases often settle at or shortly after the NE.

General CADRe Procedures

Per California Rule of Court 3.221 and Santa Barbara Superior Court Rule 1102, plaintiffs or their attorneys are required to provide CADRe Program information and an ADR Stipulation form to all other parties at the time of serving them with the summons and complaint. Per SBSC Rules 1309 and 1102 all parties to the litigation must file a Case Management Statement no later than fifteen days before the initial Case Management Conference and serve copies of their Case Management Statement on all other parties. The statement form and all other CADRe-related forms can be filled-out online from the CADRe website.

At the initial Case Management Conference the judge will make a determination of the amount in controversy. If the judge determines that the amount in controversy exceeds $50,000.00, the judge may refer the case to CADRe for “CMADRESS,” which stands for Case Management Alternative Dispute Resolution Early Settlement Session. This order requires trial counsel and their clients to attend a consultation with a neutral assigned to the case by the CADRe Director to discuss the potential benefits of ADR for their case. The neutral will then submit a brief report on the consultation to the court via the CADRe office.

Cases with an amount in controversy that does not exceed $50,000.00 [which in the past may have been sent to non-binding judicial arbitration] may now be sent to Limited Mediation instead of judicial arbitration via the CADRe program at no (or reduced) cost to the participants. For Limited Mediation, the parties must always contact the CADRe office first for CADRe to assign a mediator to the case at court expense. If the parties do not follow CADRe mediator assignment procedures, then the parties are responsible for paying in full for the services of the mediator they contact, and the court will not pay any portion of it.

According to SBSC Rule 1102 if the parties agree on an ADR process, they will then select a neutral to conduct the ADR process from the CADRe panel rosters, contact the neutral, set the date for the ADR process, and return the ADR Stipulation form to the CADRe office. They will then usually have 60 days to participate in ADR, unless the judge has given them a different deadline to complete ADR. At the conclusion of the ADR process the neutral then has 10 days to file a Statement of Agreement or Non-Agreement with the Court.

Appropriate Dispute Resolution (ADR) Programs Committee

Judicial Representatives:

James Rigali, Judge of the Superior Court
Colleen K. Sterne, Judge of the Superior Court


Bar Representatives:

Richard Corbo, Esq.
Victoria Lindenauer, Esq.
Elinor Reiner, Esq.
Lawrence T. Sorensen, Esq.


Darrel E. Parker, Trial Courts Executive Officer & Clerk of Courts, ADR Coordinator
Vance Saukko, CADRe Director